Thursday, September 25, 2014

Femininity in "Hard Times"

Hard Times is about facts, and how the emphasis that Victorian society placed on them can be detrimental to overall happiness, which is why as I read the novel I focused on the two main female characters; Sissy and Louisa and how their gender affected various aspects of the novel. In the age when Dickens was writing (just as they still are today) woman were put into little boxes and expected to display only feminine traits. This meant they were compassionate, pure, sensitive, docile, and more.  But just to be clear: it is not a bad thing if a woman has these characteristics, the problem comes from men assuming and forcing that all women to fit into their fatly preconception of what a woman “should” be.

These characteristics are all in stark contrast to what the main male characters of the novel stand for, which is what makes Hard Times interesting. In the beginning of the novel when Gradgrind is lecturing the students on facts and fancy, it is not just the boys he is trying to make accept his narrow vision of the world, but the girls as well. In the second chapter when discussing “proper” ways to paper walls and carpet a house Sissy sands up for what she likes, and tells Gradgrind “It wouldn't hurt them, Sit. They wouldn't crush and wither, if you please Sir. They would be pictures of what was very pretty and pleasant, and I would fancy—“ (5). Here Sissy is not just speaking her mind and declaring her love for something, but the object that she fancies (flowers) are something that are associated with femininity. In response to this Gradgrind says “Ay, ay, ay! But you mustn’t fancy…That’s it! You are never to fancy” (5). By placing this exchange at the beginning of the novel, Dickens is both setting up the theme of the opposition between fact and fancy and firmly rooting these two characters on either side, but he is also really setting up Sissy as an interesting character, who brings in that stereotypical female side into a novel whose main characters are utterly devoid of emotion.  


Because this novel is critiquing society I saw that Sissy’s ability to feel emotions is meant to be seen as a positive trait. The message Dickens is trying to send through this novel is that a sole reliance on facts will lead to a miserable life. This is demonstrated through Stephen Blackpool and Rachael, Stephen is tired and worn down with the monotony of his life as a mill worker, and it is not facts that help him with this, it is the gentle way Rachael’s treats him. Additionally it is Sissy that brings love into the Gradgrind house, and is the one who, through the love of her children and the family she makes for herself, teaches Louisa how to feel sympathy and to recognize the emotions her father tried so hard to suppress in her. So despite the negativity that society has always placed on woman and the characteristics associated with them, is femininity, not facts, that saves (some of) the characters of Hard Times.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Superhero "Blog Carnival"

The topic of the Byronic and Romantic heroes really interested me and caught my attention this week. Heroes are a big part of our entertainment. People go crazy over the new Batman, Spiderman, and Iron Man films—it is just the way we are as a society.  We are captivated by the heroism, the strength, talent, intelligence, and the pure uniqueness of these super heroes. But the real question is why? What about them draws us in? Is it the fact that they go against society’s rules and the government? Is it how arrogant/confident they are; yet they possess this charismatic quality about themselves? I think it helps people be someone they are not, but at the same time they are relatable in many ways. How many of you as little kids dressed up as these characters for Halloween? I’m guessing many of you! It’s cause superheroes draw us in…we all want to have that mysterious and awesome superpower.

Check out this link on more insight as to why we are obsessed with superheroes:


I like this link because it shows how we can relate to these superheroes. They can be flawed like us; we are not perfect and neither are they. It also is interesting that this article talks about how these superheroes fight and conquer all who are most currently trending in the world. For example, Batman has fought the Nazi’s and has attacked Pearl Harbor. In one of his most recent films, he has fought Bane, the villain, who has a ton of new technical gadgets (in today’s technical society we are so intrigued by this).  This goes for many of the other superheroes too. Adam West, a start in the ‘60’s version of the Batman movie, said it best: “superheroes never grow old. They just change with the times.”

I chose this link for you guys to check out because it touches on the universality of the popularity of superheroes (a unique trait that makes them universal):


One of my favorite points that this link makes is the biblical references. Who knew that the origin of these superheroes could be traced back biblically? Do you guys believe the point that this author is making? Do you see connections between superheroes and religion? If so, what?

For the last link, I want to direct you to the last section labeled “examples”:


I liked this section because it shows a bunch of different types of heroes—specifically Byronic heroes (heroes that are arrogant, charismatic, and self-destructive—“mad, bad, and dangerous to know”). It shows that all [Byronic] heroes come in different shapes and sizes. However, all these characters are well known, linking back to out obsession of the superhero theme in our society’s entertainment.