Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Let's talk about Sherlock Holmes!

Arthur Conan Doyle's famous story of Sherlock Holmes is so entertaining. Before this class I have never read or watched any Sherlock Holmes stories or movies and after watching the BBC adaption of "The Scandal In Bohemia" (or as they call it "A Scandal in Belgravia") I want to continue to watch the series! I really enjoyed the episode and liked the actual story just as much. For the most part BBC followed the story line of the story really well. However, they changed a few things (like most tv and movie adaptions do), but I actually thought the changes made the story better. First change that I liked was the fact that Irene Adler was a more complex character. By this I mean, she seemed to have a lot more speaking lines in the story--which helped us get a better sense of her as a character. She completely upstages Holmes and it is so great because Holmes definitely holds himself at a higher standard than everyone else. Adler is the one person he cannot look down upon and cannot for the life of him figure her out--the tv series does a fantastic job of showing her intelligence and how she challenges Holmes. This relates to the theme of masculinity in this story. Holmes--as I mentioned before--puts himself on a very high pedestal and he hates the fact of someone "beating" him or outsmarting him. This story knocks him down a few pegs because not only does he get beat--but he gets beat by a woman (which makes it all the better if you ask me). Society has always thought of men as the "smarter" sex--unfortunate, but true. It wasn't up until the late 19th century that we see woman in the workforce. Holmes, like many men (not all men!) view woman as being less smart than them. One of the reasons why I love this story is because Doyle writes a story where this societal idea is completely contradicted…and it's great! Irene Adler's character shows that woman are smart, witty, and intelligent just like men. 

Another aspect of the tv show that I liked and picked up on was that they used the same lines from the story--not all of them were verbatim but they used the "famous" lines and incorporated them into the show. For example, in the story when Irene Adler is disguised as a an and says "Goodnight Mr. Holmes" is said a few times in the tv show as well. In the show, Adler texts Holmes  the same line--and I immediately recognized that that was one of the lines they used in the story! I really like when the movie and tv adaptions of stories uses lines from the actual text because to me it makes it more credible and usually represents that they are following the original story well (which is always a good thing). 

Overall, I really enjoyed reading this particular story of Sherlock Holmes. I know that there are many more stories of his and I can't wait to read them--or watch them! My question to  you is: What other themes besides masculinity did you see present in this particular story? What changes did the tv show make that you liked? Were there any differences in the tv show that you didn't care for?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

Thursday, October 23, 2014

British Imperialism

In class we briefly touched on the idea of what Rudyard Kipling was exactly trying to portray with his works that we read. Both the "The White Man's Burden" and "The Man Who Would Be King" have a seriously imperialistic message on the surface level, and it is highly debated if this was Kipling’s way of criticizing this aspect of British culture or it was really how he felt. I personally do not have a straight answer. But in many ways, it is not important what Kipling actually meant, what matters is most is people reading his works since they were first published have interpreted them as a part of this imperialistic rhetoric that plagued Britain in the 19th century. To provide some historical context to the world that Kipling was writing in, the British Empire was massive at the time, claiming ownership over India, Canada, Australia, various areas of Africa and more. Because as the famous saying goes “The sun never sets on the British Empire”. This is illustrated in a political cartoon from the time below, with the caption describing England as the "devilfish".
One of the motivating factors behind imperialism was this “white savior complex” which is evident in the language Kipling uses in the "The White Man's Burden" with lines such as, "Take up the White Man's burden, Have done with childish days—" (25), and by calling the people native to the areas that England colonized “Half-devil and half-child” (4). Specifically associating these people with the devil and children speaks volumes of the attitudes of the British. The half devil part clearly means that they view them as evil, and the half child part means that they see them, as people who need to be taken care of, which is were the British Empire comes in, they saw the act of colonizing as saving these people from themselves. This language Kipling uses is what the people of the British empire were using at the time to justify going in and taking over societies that had been functioning just fine for thousands of years. But the colonizers from England did not care about any of this- they just saw cultures different from their own that needed to be “fixed”, so they imposed their western standards onto these people, and created systems of oppression that many countries are struggling to recover from to this day. So regardless of the true meaning behind Kipling's words, in the end it does not matter, because society saw them as backing up the imperialistic views of England at the time, so that is what they have come to be synonymous with. 

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Women's Rights and Women's Suffrage in the 19th and early 20th centuries

This week in English 372, we looked at some pieces from the 19th century and early 20th century that related to women’s suffrage and women’s rights. What we found was both interesting and shocking. I hadn’t realized before, but it took almost a century for activists for women’s rights to win the battle that led to the 19th Amendment of the Constitution to be put in place. And on Election Day in 1920, when millions of women voted for the first time ever, it changed the world. But it was a long time coming.
Some of the most disturbing things I have seen and read were the political cartoons that were used during the 19th century to dissuade people from allowing women to vote. One, shown below, was a picture of a woman’s head and depicting what is inside it, merely included things like clothing, chocolate, children, men, and very little of anything that would prove women have any intellectual abilities outside of being a housewife. As a woman, it is degrading to see. And the very saddest part of all is that some people still feel that way today. Just like many people are still racist, and anti-homosexual, and biased towards their own religions. Even though we have made large strides in equality, we are still fairly far from it.
In one article written by a female member of the National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage in the late 1800s wrote of reasons why women should not have the rights that they desire and one of them included, “Because the woman suffrage movement is a backward step in the progress of civilization, in that it seeks to efface natural differentiation of function, and to produce identity, instead of division of labor.” And she also said, “Because it is our fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons who represent us at the ballot box. Our fathers and our brothers love us; our husbands are our choice, and one with us; our sons are what WE MAKE THEM. We are content that they represent US in the corn-field, on the battle-field, and at the ballet-box”. And all of this and more was written by a woman. It was common for some women to believe this side of it, to listen to their husbands and agree with them, and to look down upon other women for wanting to have rights. And it still happens today. It seems more often today that you see men banding together and if not banding together, at the very least not trying to sabotage each other. Where we see women are all about cat-fights and slut-shaming each other for trying to be independent of the norm. You see it made fun of in social media all the time today. Women shame each other for wanting to be only friends with men because other women are mean to them. But it is so true. And so sad. Women should be all banding together and helping one another but so much of the time pettiness and jealousy gets in the way of that.

But it wasn’t all bad back in the 19th century and early 20th century. Not only were wealthy white women supporters of women’s rights, men like Frederick Douglass, a former slave and a leader of an abolition movement, was on board with women’s right to vote. And not just white women, but black women as well actively supported the movement, like Ida B. Wells-Barnett (known for her leading against lynching). Susan B. Anthony was a huge leader in getting women the right to vote. When she registered to vote in 1872 she was fined by the Congress of the United States a hundred dollars. And we know it has gotten better. Rights have been given. It has taken a lot of time, but women finally were justly given the right to vote in 1920, although it wasn’t until the 1960s when everyone, including black women, was given the rights to vote. It is still an ongoing battle of equality for women and men as it is with race and sex and religion among so many other things but we are slowly progressing forward.

 


http://www.radford.edu/rbarris/Women%20and%20art/amerwom05/suffrageart.html

(From New York, 1912)

​(New York, 1894)




Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Field Trip to MASC


Up until Tuesday, I had not heard of MASC. Come to find out it is on our campus and accessible to students here at WSU. The MASC—which stands for Manuscripts, Archives, and Special Collections—is located at the bottom of the Rotunda in Holland/Terrell Libraries. Coming into this, I had no idea what to expect…maybe some ancient books locked up in see through cases that we can admire without touching…or maybe just books labeled with a huge “DO NOT TOUCH SIGN.” Surprisingly, neither of these were the case. I was (and still am) amazed at how we could touch and look through these old books; there were no plastic cases or “do not touch” signs strongly pointing us away from them. I think it is so great that we can actually touch, flip through, smell, and read these classic, old books. One book that stood out to me was Uncle Tom’s Cabin. This particular book had survived a flood back in the late 1800’s and here it is today—you can tell that it is old and worn out, but that fact that I got to touch and feel a book that old was incredible. The fact that WSU Libraries has a place like MASC that allows students to come in and view such documents and artifacts is pretty amazing—it shows that they really are here for the students and that they want us to feel comfortable and welcome in coming to view such items. After class, I was a still curious as to what MASC was all about and wanted to know more, after finding their website I was able to understand more about them and what they offered. They were founded by WSU Libraries in 1977 and contains many types of material such as: personal and family documents (diaries, letters, etc.), collections based on the Northwest region, WSU papers, etc. They also have rotating exhibits in the main part of the MASC. Currently, it is World War I and the Palouse. In the past they have featured: Nez Perce Indians, Early Days of WSU Football, Washington Territory, and First Women in Graduate Education at WSU. These are just a few of the exhibits that have been featured at the MASC. I like how they typically display things related to Washington State—such as the Palouse, Washington State University, and tribes or people of this region. It makes it much more relatable and interesting because then we can visualize and learn about our local history. I think that by knowing the history of places around us we will appreciate it a lot more. As I said before I think it is so great that they feature history of our own University because it helps students learn about and appreciate WSU so much more. I am so glad to have had the opportunity to visit the MASC and I definitely plan on visiting again. What stood out to you at the MASC? Were you surprised at anything? Did you think there was something else they needed to have and display there? I am curious to know your thoughts and opinions about our class visit to the MASC!